This query concerns only resources held in libraries.
7 results
Sort by:
Add to the list:
Expand to all references (without full text)
    • Article
    Select

    Correction to: Laparoscopic gastrectomy and metastasectomy for stage IV gastric cancer

    Min, Sa-Hong, Won, Yongjoon, Lee, Kanghaeng, Youn, Sang Il, Kim, Guowei, Park, Young Suk, Ahn, Sang-Hoon, Park, Do Joong, Kim, Hyung-Ho
    Surgical endoscopy, April 2021, Vol.35(4), pp.1888 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
    MEDLINE/PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine)
    Available
    More…
    Title: Correction to: Laparoscopic gastrectomy and metastasectomy for stage IV gastric cancer
    Author: Min, Sa-Hong; Won, Yongjoon; Lee, Kanghaeng; Youn, Sang Il; Kim, Guowei; Park, Young Suk; Ahn, Sang-Hoon; Park, Do Joong; Kim, Hyung-Ho
    Description: This article was updated to correct Do Joong Park’s name: Do Joong (given name) Park (family name).
    Is part of: Surgical endoscopy, April 2021, Vol.35(4), pp.1888
    Identifier: 1432-2218 (E-ISSN); 32399940 Version (PMID); 10.1007/s00464-020-07630-4 (DOI)

    • Several versions

    Peritoneal metastatic goblet-cell carcinoid tumor treated with cytoreductive surgery and intraperitoneal chemotherapy

    Youn, Sang Il, Namgung, Hwan, Yun, Jeong Seok, Park, Yun Jun, Park, Dong-Guk
    Annals of coloproctology, April 2015, Vol.31(2), pp.74-8 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

    View all versions

    • Article
    Select

    Laparoscopic gastrectomy and metastasectomy for stage IV gastric cancer

    Min, Sa-Hong, Won, Yongjoon, Lee, Kanghaeng, Youn, Sang Il, Kim, Guowei, Park, Young Suk, Ahn, Sang-Hoon, Park, Do Joong, Kim, Hyung-Ho
    Surgical endoscopy, April 2021, Vol.35(4), pp.1879-1887 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
    MEDLINE/PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine)
    Available
    More…
    Title: Laparoscopic gastrectomy and metastasectomy for stage IV gastric cancer
    Author: Min, Sa-Hong; Won, Yongjoon; Lee, Kanghaeng; Youn, Sang Il; Kim, Guowei; Park, Young Suk; Ahn, Sang-Hoon; Park, Do Joong; Kim, Hyung-Ho
    Subject: Advanced Gastric Cancer ; Gastrectomy ; Laparoscopy ; Metastasis ; Survival
    Description: The standard recommended treatment of stage IV gastric cancer is palliative chemotherapy. The aim of this study is to evaluate the role of radical gastrectomy with metastasectomy in these patients, as well as to explore the feasibility and safety of a laparoscopic approach. 117 consecutive patients with pathologically proven Stage IV gastric cancer who underwent radical gastrectomy with metastasectomy were enrolled in this study. We evaluated short-term and long-term outcomes, comparing laparoscopic surgery with open surgery by propensity score matching. The 5-year overall survival rate (OSR) was 23.2% and the median survival time (MST) was 19.8 months. After propensity scoring matching, the 5-year OSR and MST of laparoscopy group was 23.4%, 17.9 months and in the open group, it was 25.0%, 22.8 months (p = 0.882). The complication rate was 5.6% in the laparoscopy group and 23.4% in the open group (p = 0.069). In multivariate analysis, adjuvant chemotherapy, chemotherapy cycle, and postoperative complication were independent prognostic factors of overall survival. Radical gastrectomy with metastasectomy could have a potential role in stage IV gastric cancer. Laparoscopic gastrectomy with metastasectomy in selected stage IV gastric cancer patients is safe and feasible.
    Is part of: Surgical endoscopy, April 2021, Vol.35(4), pp.1879-1887
    Identifier: 1432-2218 (E-ISSN); 32342215 Version (PMID); 10.1007/s00464-020-07592-7 (DOI)

    • Article
    Select

    Three-dimensional (3D) visualization provides better outcome than two-dimensional (2D) visualization in single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis

    Kang, So Hyun, Won, Yongjoon, Lee, Kanghaeng, Youn, Sang Il, Min, Sa-Hong, Park, Young Suk, Ahn, Sang-Hoon, Kim, Hyung-Ho
    Langenbeck's archives of surgery, March 2021, Vol.406(2), pp.473-478 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
    MEDLINE/PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine)
    Available
    More…
    Title: Three-dimensional (3D) visualization provides better outcome than two-dimensional (2D) visualization in single-port laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis
    Author: Kang, So Hyun; Won, Yongjoon; Lee, Kanghaeng; Youn, Sang Il; Min, Sa-Hong; Park, Young Suk; Ahn, Sang-Hoon; Kim, Hyung-Ho
    Subject: Laparoscopy ; Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures ; Stomach Neoplasm ; Three-Dimensional
    Description: There are currently no reports on the application of three-dimensional (3D) vision to single-incision laparoscopic surgery. This study compared 3D vision to the previous two-dimensional (2D) system in single-incision laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (SIDG). Medical charts of 179 gastric cancer patients who underwent SIDG from February 2014 to December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were grouped into either a 2D group or 3D group depending on the type of camera that was used. All operations were performed using a flexible camera (Olympus, Japan). Operative data and postoperative outcome were analyzed. There were 90 patients in the 2D group and 89 patients in the 3D group. No differences were found in terms of the age, body mass index, staging, and other demographics of the patients. Operative time was significantly faster in the 3D group (115.6 ± 34.0 vs. 129.4 ± 38.5 min, p = 0.012), and estimated blood loss (EBL) was less in the 3D group (20.7 ± 30.0 vs. 35.1 ± 56.0 ml, p = 0.034). Patients in the 3D group were able to start a small fluid diet earlier (2.5, range 1-6 vs. 3.0, range 2-8 postoperative days, p = 0.006) and were discharged faster (5.4, range 3-12 vs. 6.2, range 4-24 postoperative days, p = 0.024). There was no statistical difference between early and late complications.
    Is part of: Langenbeck's archives of surgery, March 2021, Vol.406(2), pp.473-478
    Identifier: 1435-2451 (E-ISSN); 32748044 Version (PMID); 10.1007/s00423-020-01952-6 (DOI)

    • Several versions

    Comparing the short-term outcomes and cost between solo single-incision distal gastrectomy and conventional multiport totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for early gastric cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

    Lee, Boram, Youn, Sang Il, Lee, Kanghaeng, Won, Yongjoon, Min, Sahong, Lee, Yoon Taek, Park, Young Suk, Ahn, Sang-Hoon, Park, Do Joong, Kim, Hyung-Ho
    Annals of surgical treatment and research, February 2021, Vol.100(2), pp.67-75 [Peer Reviewed Journal]

    View all versions

    • Article
    Select

    Prospective randomized controlled study for comparison of 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma

    Lee, Kanghaeng, Youn, Sang Il, Won, Yongjoon, Min, Sa-Hong, Park, Young Suk, Ahn, Sang-Hoon, Park, Do Joong, Kim, Hyung-Ho
    Surgical endoscopy, February 2021, Vol.35(2), pp.934-940 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
    MEDLINE/PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine)
    Available
    More…
    Title: Prospective randomized controlled study for comparison of 2-dimensional versus 3-dimensional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy for gastric adenocarcinoma
    Author: Lee, Kanghaeng; Youn, Sang Il; Won, Yongjoon; Min, Sa-Hong; Park, Young Suk; Ahn, Sang-Hoon; Park, Do Joong; Kim, Hyung-Ho
    Subject: 3-Dimensional Laparoscpy ; Gastric Adenocarcinoma ; Laparoscopic Distal Gastrectomy ; Operation Time ; Postoperative Complication ; Prospective Randomized Controlled Study
    Description: Due to the technological advance in resolution and stereoscopic depth, the 3-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic system has been widely used in real surgery. However, there have been few studies to confirm the clinical usefulness of the 3D laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). This study aimed to compare perioperative outcomes between the 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D LDG for gastric cancer patients. This was a prospective, randomized controlled, single-center, and superiority trial. This study was carried in Seoul National University Bundang Hospital. Patients with histologically confirmed gastric adenocarcinoma which could be radically resected by LDG were randomly assigned (1:1) to the 2D or 3D group. From October 2016 to August 2018, 84 patients were included in this study and randomly assigned into the 2D group (44 patients) or the 3D group (40 patients). A total of 5 patients were excluded; 3 in the 2D group and 2 were in the 3D group. Consequently, the data from 79 patients were analyzed (2D: 41 cases; 3D: 38 cases). For the LDG procedure, 3D and 2D camera and display system were applied according to the assigned group. The primary end point was the duration of total laparoscopic operation time. Secondary end points included the amount of intraoperative blood loss (IBL), the number of harvested lymph nodes, postoperative complications and open conversion rate. There were no differences between 2 and 3D groups with respect to clinicopathologic characteristics. The total operation time in 3D groups was significantly shorter than 2D group (122 [106.5-161] versus 101 [77.75-125.5] minutes; P = 0.001). The postoperative complication rates in the 3D groups was significantly lower than 2D group (24.4% versus 7.9%, respectively; P = 0.045). 3D LDG shorten the operation time compared with 2D LDG in gastric cancer patients. And 3D laparoscopy provided the benefit of less postoperative complications. cris.nih.go.kr number KCT0003717.
    Is part of: Surgical endoscopy, February 2021, Vol.35(2), pp.934-940
    Identifier: 1432-2218 (E-ISSN); 32356108 Version (PMID); 10.1007/s00464-020-07587-4 (DOI)

    • Article
    Select

    Quality of life after laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery in early gastric cancer: a single-center cohort study

    Youn, Sang Il, Son, Sang Yong, Lee, Kanghaeng, Won, Yongjoon, Min, Sahong, Park, Young Suk, Ahn, Sang-Hoon, Kim, Hyung-Ho
    Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 03 January 2021 [Peer Reviewed Journal]
    MEDLINE/PubMed (U.S. National Library of Medicine)
    Available
    More…
    Title: Quality of life after laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery in early gastric cancer: a single-center cohort study
    Author: Youn, Sang Il; Son, Sang Yong; Lee, Kanghaeng; Won, Yongjoon; Min, Sahong; Park, Young Suk; Ahn, Sang-Hoon; Kim, Hyung-Ho
    Subject: Gastric Cancer ; Laparoscopic Gastrectomy ; Quality of Life ; Sentinel Lymph Node
    Description: To investigate the quality of life (QOL) of patients after laparoscopic sentinel node navigation surgery (SNNS) compared to conventional laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy (LADG) in early gastric cancer patients. Patients recruited for laparoscopic SNNS surgery between July 2010 and April 2013 were assessed for their QOL. A historical control group was established, consisting of patients who underwent conventional LADG with radical lymphadenectomy from the same institution. QOL questionnaire was taken serially from preoperative week 1 until 12 months postoperatively (1, 3, 6, and 12 months) using the Korean version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QOL questionnaire-core (QLQ-C30) and gastric cancer-specific questionnaire (STO22). A total of 80 prospectively gathered patients who received SNNS were categorized into the comparison group (SNNS group). The QOL was compared with 78 patients identified to have received LADG from the gastric cancer database of our institution and were sorted into the control group (LADG group). In QLQ-C30, SNNS group showed better functioning scales in all except role functioning and better scores from the symptom scales in fatigue, insomnia, and diarrhea compared to the LADG group. In QLQ-STO22, scores on dysphagia, eating restriction, anxiety, and body image disturbance were better in SNNS group. Postoperative QOL in laparoscopic gastrectomy combined with SNNS is superior compared to conventional laparoscopic distal gastrectomy in patients with stage I gastric cancer.
    Is part of: Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association, 03 January 2021
    Identifier: 1436-3305 (E-ISSN); 33389274 Version (PMID); 10.1007/s10120-020-01145-6 (DOI)